But your Honor, I . . . .
_______________________________________________
San Mateo, CA - County Superior Court [judge] Lisa Novak (39 yrs. old) says, "Do you have a reason for not going to the doctors you were ordered to see?"
Criminal defendant says, "Yes. Do you have an excuse for not recusing yourself?"
Novak, "Bailiff, arrest the defendant."Listen in - HERE - Two minute .Mp3 audio file of hearing and arrest for contempt.
Judge Lisa A. Novak
Northern Court
1050 Mission Road
South San Francisco, CAAppointed 2005 by A. Schwarzeneggar.
_______________________________________________
County judge in San Mateo, CA, flies off the handle to find contempt and arrest a man without cause. Bail is demanded and at the hearing the man was refused the opportunity to give the judge the lawful excuse for not seeing doctors as ordered, an excuse he indeed had and should not therefore have been found in contempt.
The funny thing about this, beyond the political laundry element of all of this, is that it illustrates how absolutely ballistic you can be when invoking American jurisprudence and the criminal code. I don't just have a motion, but rather I have a host of attempts to cause the arrest and prosecution of everyone involved in the abuse; and this is directed solely at causing judge (loosely) Lisa Novak to recuse herself.
Upon determining that a deprivation of rights to allocute of one who's not in contempt, followed by his arrest for contempt, I knew that a bar to jurisdiction had occurred, making his loss of liberty by force and his detention for ransom the actual commission of several crimes.County Superior Court filing: This first filing serves several vital purposes -
1) to constitute a repository of all, but only the necessary, evidence to apply pressure under the criminal code,
2) to put in writing and on the record a depiction of gov't abuse in terms of criminal statutes and prison terms, all of which is designed to cause discomfort and unease,
3) to implicate the judge in criminal allegations or in relation to such, which not only causes further unease but also destroys the appearance of fairness,
4) to prove to everyone involved against you that they're not the only ones who can litigate offensively, and
5) most importantly this filing serves as a component of a broader attack aimed solely at getting a derelict and terroristic judge (Lisa M. Novak) to get away from this defendant and his case; nothing more.
State criminal complaint - WORD VERSION - These two documents were filed first, in Superior Court (on Friday August 31, 2007, to ruin Labor Day weekend for the defendants), asking that a Grand Jury be empanelled to investigate charges of kidnapping for ransom, robbery, assault, etc. Filed in person so as to get a date stamp on Joe Lunchbucket's copies.
Petition for Grand Jury - WORD VERSION - Cal. Penal Code § 904 provides for a Grand Jury to be empanelled when in the Public's interest.
You'll see here that a copy of the state criminal complaint was the only exhibit in support of the FBI complaint below, along with its exhibits, so planning of the number of copies from the start is important. At each stop this individual was getting his copies date stamped received. The state crimes no doubt translate into the federal crimes alleged in this complaint to the FBI and the evidence makes the allegations irrefutable, which causes all of those involved to think of nothing but their future depositions where they'll have to claim 5th Amdt. privileges.
Criminal complaint to FBI:
Fed/FBI CC - WORD VERSION - This FBI citizen's criminal complaint for violation of 18 USC 241 and 242.
I feel that I have thoroughly destroyed the appearance of fairness with all of this, and that forms the basis for the affidavit of prejudice, which was the goal all along; remember? "How can I get this mollusk of a judge the Hell away from me and my case?!?!"
Affidavit of prejudice for his case:
Affidavit of prejudice - WORD VERSION - This affidavit of prejudice was filed into Joe's case with exhibit, the FBI complaint with its exhibit, the State complaint, showing that the appearance of fairness is lost and that the judge must therefore recuse. She had refused to do so and was questioned about it at the August 22, 2007 hearing and that's why she had Joe arrested.
This is just what I chose to do in this instance, and Joe understood that he was acting on his own by filing these. I hope you can see how I employed offense and NO DEFENSE in attempting to convince the judge she should recuse. Yes, kidnapping charges (almost) and conflict of interest - Destroy the appearance of fairness to create a storm over any prejudicial fault in any proceedings, and this can recuse any judge at any time. To hear the outcome of this effort listen to this testimonial (47 mb / 25 min. .Mp3) from a man who went as a witness and as support to these three hearings.
David R. Myrland
P.S. What you see here is the result of three eight-hour shifts' work over three days time after receiving the cassette tape of Joe's arrest via overnight delivery.